<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>APRI – Africa Policy Research Institute &#45; Stacey Links</title>
<link>https://afripoli.org/rss/author/stacey-links</link>
<description>APRI – Africa Policy Research Institute &#45; Stacey Links</description>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:rights>© APRI – Africa Policy Research Institute gGmbH. 2026</dc:rights>

<item>
<title>On African Agency in Global Politics: The Case of China and the BRI in Africa</title>
<link>https://afripoli.org/on-african-agency-in-global-politics-the-case-of-china-and-the-bri-in-africa</link>
<guid>https://afripoli.org/on-african-agency-in-global-politics-the-case-of-china-and-the-bri-in-africa</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Seeing African actors simply as easily persuaded by China’s “charm” ignores how African actors drive engagement on their own terms and on issues of preexisting concern. ]]></description>
<enclosure url="https://afripoli.org/uploads/images/2021/06/image_750x500_60d787eec2fac.jpg" length="73838" type="image/jpeg"/>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 06:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Stacey Links</dc:creator>
<media:keywords>african agency, global politics, china</media:keywords>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>